Traveling merchants of European “values” once again gathered in Yerevan. With great solemnity, bold faces, and a standard package of diplomatic smiles, they came to explain to the Armenian people once again what a great “luck” we have had to become a geopolitical laboratory mouse. And in that background, a confession was heard from the lips of the French president, which, no matter how much it was wrapped in a civilized vocabulary, essentially exposed the very content of what was happening around Armenia.
Emmanuel Macron made an almost happy assessment, according to which eight years ago nobody would have come to Armenia, because it was seen as a “de facto satellite” of Russia, and now, after the “velvet revolution” of Nikol Pashinyan, the country has been “de-Parisianized” and has become acceptable.
Here is the whole truth, without unnecessary masks.
The West openly says that Armenia is valuable to the extent that it leaves Russia. Not so much as a state, not so much as an endangered nation, not so much as a region that has seen war and Genocide, not so much as an age-old civilization facing the danger of becoming a mere historical memory, but as an anti-Russian platform, as a political sign: “Look, we are taking another country out of Moscow’s influence.”
And Nikol Pashinyan’s government has become the perfect local operator of that program.
“De-Persianization”? no, the perfect risk incubator
“De-risking” from Macron’s lips is a classic example of political cynicism. What risk did Armenia get rid of?
Artsakh does not exist. 120 thousand Armenians were forcibly displaced from their homeland. Azerbaijan controls strategic heights. Borders have turned into an object of constant blackmail. Baku presents a new demand every week, from the Constitution to the “corridor”. Turkey continues the same pan-Turkist line, just more self-confident.
Is this the Frenchization?
This is the consequence of the multiplication of risks, the destruction of state immunity, and the conscious destruction of the security system. And it happened not by chance, but since the street performance of 2018 was presented as a “democratic rescue”, but in fact it became the start of external realignment.
Armenia was told to leave Russia, we will give you peace.
As a result, we got a country separated from Russia, but also deprived of peace.
This, Mr. Macron, is a crime committed against national security and the Republic of Armenia, not the “de-risking” you mentioned, the de-Frenchization.
And you, speaking on behalf of France and European values, not only give political patronage to that national disaster, but with your colored vocabulary you try to morally legitimize a crime, the consequences of which the Armenian people will suffer for decades.
Pashinyan turned Armenia into a testing ground for anti-Russian sentiment
The key and most dangerous feature of Pashinyan’s foreign policy is that this government long ago stopped considering Armenia’s own security and state problems as issues subject to primary solution. Instead, Armenia is gradually involved in such geopolitical processes, the agenda of which is formed not in Yerevan, but in external power centers.
In other words, the government does not try to keep Armenia away from the confrontations of great powers and the consequences of these conflicts, but on the contrary, it makes the country a territory used within these confrontations.
One of the main problems for the West today is to weaken Russia on as many fronts as possible. Ukraine is a military front, Georgia, Moldova – a political, energetic front, and Armenia is turning into a Caucasian strategic logistics front and an anti-Russian showpiece – a demonstrative example of a “former Russian ally that renounces Moscow”.
That is why European officials come to Yerevan one by one, praise the “reforms”, talk about “sovereignty”, “crossroads of peace”, “diversification”. Because it is not important for them whether Armenia is protected or not. It is important for Armenia to leave the Russian security system and politically place itself in the anti-Russian camp.
In other words, Pashinyan did not balance, but put the country in serious existential danger.
French “love” – another soft pillow
The role of France is a separate topic. For years, this country was presented as an almost savior force for a part of the Armenian society. Every time, when Yerevan suffered another defeat, a beautiful announcement, an exciting speech, a parliamentary resolution was made from Paris, and an information bubble was inflated in Armenia: “here, France is with us”.
Let’s remember November 2020. The French Senate enthusiastically adopted a resolution calling for the recognition of Artsakh’s independence. Fiery speeches were heard in the hall: self-determination, justice, historical justice. The Armenian public was once again carried away by emotional self-deception.
And then? Then nothing.
There was no recognition, no political pressure, no practical step, no security mechanism. Because the purpose of that resolution was not to help the Armenians, but to influence the Armenians through false hope. In short, cheating.
And with the same high European patronage, the process of delegitimization of the tripartite document of November 9 began in 2022, the end result of which was the final handover of Artsakh.
In other words, first the Armenians were fed with the illusion of recognition, then the same Armenians were led to the path of renouncing Artsakh.
Yerevan has become a decoration, and Armenia has become a bargaining chip
Looking at the faces of these “friends” gathering in Yerevan today, one question arises. Who among them will answer for the Armenian people’s lost homeland, destroyed security, humiliated statehood?
Zelensky came to preach more sanctions against Russia.
Macron came to praise Pashinyan’s revolution and “independence” from Russia.
Other European officials came to preach about democracy and anti-Russian propaganda.
But none of them came to say how to rebuild Armenian security, how to prevent new Azerbaijani aggression, how to restore national dignity.
Because that is not their agenda.
Their agenda is as follows: to keep Armenia under their influence, to use it as a propaganda showcase against Moscow, and at the same time not to allow this society to soberly assess the price it pays for this “European attention”.
Epilogue:
For years, this government has convinced the public that anti-Russian rhetoric is sovereignty, Western smiles are security, and European summits are international success.
The reality is the opposite.
Armenia has never been so alone, so vulnerable, so under pressure.
And when Macron proudly says that Armenia is no longer a satellite of Russia, he is actually recording one thing: the country has been successfully removed from the former security zone, but has not yet entered any new protected system.
In other words, they left us in the open field.
Pashinyan presents that open field as independence. Europeans as a democratic achievement. And the people pay the price for it every day, with territory, rights, and future.
This is the whole picture.
Macron’s speech in Yerevan just accidentally raised what has been going on silently for a long time: Armenia has turned into an Armenian springboard for anti-Russianism, while it is being sold to the Armenian people as a project for peace, democracy and the future.
The irony of fate is that the price of such projects is always paid not by the planners, but by the people who have become the testing ground.
Աղբյուր՝ Armenian Public Tribunal
—