Armenpress: Congo says death toll in fastest-growing Ebola outbreak has passed

International17:18, 30 July 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

The fastest-growing Ebola outbreak has killed more than 1,500 people in eastern Congo, AP reported citing official data, marking a 50% increase in around a week that shows the emergency continuing to outpace response efforts.

3,442 cases have been recorded, with 1,521 deaths, according to the latest government update.

The outbreak, which was declared on May 15, has been linked to the Bundibugyo virus, for which there are no approved vaccines or treatments.

There are currently 797 patients in isolation or hospitalized, while a further 615 patients have recovered, the data showed. Contact tracing continues to lag, with only around 78% of known contacts monitored nationwide, well below the 95% target health officials say is needed to interrupt transmission.

Displacement from armed conflict and illegal mining in the region have made it difficult to trace thousands who have come in contact with infected individuals, according to AP.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Op-ed: If Armenia’s ruling party wants constitutional reform, it needs support

Constitution Net
July 30, 2026
Following Armenia’s parliamentary elections, debate has emerged over whether the ruling Civil Contract party can initiate major constitutional changes without holding a two-thirds majority in the National Assembly. Civil Contract controls 64 of Parliament’s 105 seats. This gives the party a three-fifths majority, but it remains six votes short of the 70 seats required for a two-thirds majority. That difference is important because Armenia’s Constitution establishes separate procedures for ordinary legislation, constitutional laws and amendments to the Constitution itself. [ . . . ] Civil Contract’s parliamentary majority gives it broad control over legislation and constitutional laws, but it is not sufficient to independently approve a referendum on a new Constitution or major constitutional amendments.
Read the full article here: Horizon

She fled Russia for Armenia, then insulted its summer water festival. Now Russ

Meduza
July 30, 2026

Armenia’s Investigative Committee has opened a criminal case against Nadezhda Pirozhkova, a Russian national who publicly criticized the traditions of the Vardavar holiday. The agency confirmed the case to the Russian news outlet Vot Tak.

On Vardavar, the Armenian summer holiday that falls 14 weeks after Easter, getting soaked with water is the whole point — and no one is supposed to take offense. “The water is believed to have healing properties on this day,” the outlet Novosti-Armenia said, “so being doused only brings good luck.”

On July 12, Pirozhkova posted a reel on Instagram complaining about the tradition of dousing people with water during Vardavar. “This isn’t a manifestation of culture, it’s a manifestation of disrespect toward people who don’t want to participate in it. […] If I’m in your country, I’m not obligated to follow some traditions. This is a direct display of aggression!” Pirozhkova said.

According to Vot Tak, she also posted a story showing water being poured over her, in which she called Armenians “rat-like” — a detail that made its way into a write-up by the propaganda outlet Sputnik Armenia, which was also covering the criminal case against her. The story has since disappeared. Meduza couldn’t find it.

Pirozhkova’s comments sparked widespread outrage. Her reel about Vardavar drew more than 250,000 views and over 5,000 comments, which have since been closed, and was condemned by both Armenians and members of the Russian diaspora. “My civilized ones! Those who love saying things like that about Armenia. So why do you keep coming here? Oh right, there’s gasoline, the internet works, and you can buy clothes?” blogger Galina Tish said in response to Pirozhkova’s video.

On July 14, Pirozhkova posted an apology: “I understand that many saw this as disrespect toward the Armenian people. And I really am sorry. I did not have that intention, and I do not have it now.” Most commenters doubted her sincerity: some said she should leave Armenia if she doesn’t like the local way of life, others called for her to be deported or jailed, and some comments included insults.

Pirozhkova is using the situation to promote her blog. In recent reels, she has said the viral videos about Vardavar boosted her reach and drew new followers. She has discussed what it’s like to endure a wave of negativity, why she keeps posting, and whether it’s acceptable to “capitalize on the Armenia hype.” Her profile bio now reads “That Same Nadya 🇦🇲 Vardavar,” and one of her recent videos is titled “Why an Entire Country Hates Me.”

Pirozhkova makes no secret of her attempts to profit from her Instagram presence. The blogger has said she came to Armenia from Russia with her husband and child after the war [in Ukraine] began — what she calls “the situation everyone knows about.” She has since separated from her husband and lost access to her documents because of a dispute with her landlord. Pirozhkova has said she also can’t return to Russia because she has debts there and fears being barred from leaving the country as a result — a restriction that would keep her from seeing her child in Armenia. In her stories, she sells info products on blogging and ”the facets of being seen.”

The criminal case against her was filed under a statute covering public statements that incite hatred, an offense punishable by up to four years in prison. Pirozhkova has said she was detained for three days before being released. She is now under a travel ban.

Armenia May Seek Billions From Russia Over Railway Concession

PRAVDA
July 30, 2026
 30.07.2026 19:36
World

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said Armenia could seek financial compensation from Russia over the operation of South Caucasus Railway CJSC, which Russian Railways (RZD) has managed under a concession agreement since 2008.

In February, Pashinyan suggested that Russia consider transferring the concession rights for Armenia’s railway network to a friendly third country, naming Kazakhstan, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates as possible candidates. In April, he clarified that Yerevan would not discuss issues related to the railway behind Moscow’s back.

Pashinyan has now said Armenia could take the dispute to international arbitration. He stressed that the country’s railway infrastructure belongs to the Armenian state and that the government has the right to decide how it should be managed. He also noted that Yerevan had refrained from making financial demands on Moscow for many years.

“There may be issues for which we have asked for nothing over the past 30 years, but now we may seek as much as $2 billion a year,” Pashinyan said.

He added that the Armenian government hopes to resolve the matter through friendly negotiations.

Russian Lawmaker Urges Pashinyan to Focus on Armenia’s Economy

Andrey Krasov, First Deputy Chairman of the Russian State Duma Committee on Defense, urged the Armenian prime minister to focus on his country’s economy instead of making multi-billion-dollar claims.

“He should think about where Armenia will sell its vegetables, fruit, and fish, because Russia has no need for low-quality products. Pashinyan’s statements about multi-billion-dollar lawsuits only damage bilateral relations that took years to build,” Krasov said.

The lawmaker argued that Russian support has played a major role in preserving Armenia’s sovereignty and infrastructure. He also warned that any deterioration in relations with Moscow could seriously affect Armenia’s agricultural sector, which relies heavily on exports.

Sokrat Khanyan, Armenian Poet And Literary Scholar, Dies At 96

July 30, 2026

Sokrat Khanyan, an Armenian poet, translator, and literary scholar whose career spanned more than seven decades, has died at 96. He passed away on July 30.

Khanyan was born on January 22, 1930, in the village of Aknakbyur, in the Hadrut region of Nagorno Karabakh. He completed his early schooling in his native village in 1944, then worked from 1947 to 1948 as secretary of the local communist organization and head of the village’s house of culture, before pursuing higher education at the Baku V. I. Lenin State Pedagogical Institute, where he studied Armenian language and literature between 1949 and 1953.

His first published poem appeared in 1950, dedicated to the memory of his elder brother, poet Suren Khanyan, who had died in the Second World War. Khanyan spent the following decade working as a journalist at the “Communist” Armenian Republican newspaper in Baku, and became a member of the USSR Writers’ Union in 1958. His debut poetry collection, “Karkach,” followed in 1959.

Khanyan returned to postgraduate study in Baku from 1962 to 1965, defending a thesis on the dramaturgy of Nairi Zaryan and earning the degree of Candidate of Philological Sciences. He moved to Stepanakert in 1969, following the closure of the Lenin Institute’s Armenian department, where he continued teaching at what became Artsakh State University. Over the following decades, he held a series of leadership positions there, including chairman of the Student Scientific Council from 1974 to 1988, dean of the Linguistic Faculty from 1978 to 1981, and head of the university’s Armenian language, literature, and journalism department from 1984 to 2007.

He also chaired the NKR Regional Committee for the Defense of Peace from 1985 to 1990. In 2002, Khanyan defended a doctoral thesis on the fate of the homeland in Armenian poetry between 1950 and 1990, earning the degree of Doctor of Philological Sciences, and received his professorship in literature in 2004.

Khanyan’s honors included the NKR’s Mesrop Mashtots medal, awarded by President of the Artsakh Republic Bako Sahakyan on Khanyan’s 80th birthday in 2010, along with the Vachagan the Pious medal, the Maternal Gratitude medal, and prizes named for the poets Muratsan and Yeghishe. In January 2020, he marked both his 90th birthday and 70 years of published poetry.

Khanyan is survived by his family, including his grandson, Armenian pianist and composer Hayk Melikyan.

Pashinyan ironically recalled Lukashenka’s words about “unnecessary Armenians”

Nasha Niva
July 30, 2026
Pashinyan ironically recalled Lukashenka’s words about “unnecessary Armenians”

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan mentioned Alexander Lukashenka in connection with his words in 2024 that, allegedly, “Armenians are needed by no one” except Russia and its partners in the post-Soviet space. He recalled this while discussing the choice between the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), Panorama.am reports .

Nikol Pashinyan. Photo: Dmitry Astakhov, Sputnik, Government Pool Photo via AP

“Why is it constantly assumed as a prerequisite that we are a ‘bad partner’? What bad has the Republic of Armenia done to anyone that the President of Belarus stated: ‘Who needs Armenia anyway?’ How can one speak like that about a sovereign country?” Pashinyan fumed.

He expressed conviction that Armenia “is needed by China, the USA, the EU, Iran, Georgia, France, Poland, Germany, Great Britain” – just as all these partners are needed by Armenia itself.

Pashinyan reminded that Armenia has signed documents on strategic partnership with China, the USA, Great Britain, the Netherlands, France, and many other countries. It did not have such a number of partners before, he noted.

“Russia sees the problem precisely in this: either relations must be exclusive, or there should be no relations at all. We do not accept such an approach,” said the head of the Armenian government.

In August 2024, Lukashenka criticized Yerevan’s political course in an interview with journalist and State Duma deputy Evgeny Popov on the “Rossiya” TV channel. He then contrasted Belarus with other post-Soviet states that begin to “flounder” and “want to take something from Russia, but give nothing in return.”

“Who needs Armenians, besides us? No one. They are needed by no one. Let them develop their economy and focus on what they have. What France, what Macron? Tomorrow Macron will be gone, and everyone will forget about this Armenia,” Lukashenka then stated.

His words caused great indignation in Armenia and led to a strong deterioration of mutual relations, which remains relevant to this day.

Armenia has prepared a response to Russia’s trade war

UA News
July 30, 2026

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated that the country’s government considers the South Caucasus Railway, which runs through its territoryto be its property. He emphasized that the country must be able to use the infrastructure at its own discretion and suggested that Armenia could demand payments from Russia of up to $2 billion per year. 

The railway infrastructure legally belongs to the Armenian government but is managed by the South Caucasus Railway (SCR), a wholly owned subsidiary of Russia’s Russian Railways (RZD). Pashinyan expressed a desire to resolve this issue amicably but left open the possibility of resorting to arbitration in the event of disagreements.

The prime minister stressed that Armenia may begin to demand compensation for the use of property that had been provided free of charge for 30 years. He stated unequivocally that this railway is the property of the republic and that there can be no other option.

Source: NEWS AM.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated that Russian restrictions on imports of Armenian products could lead to the de facto collapse of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). 

As a reminder, Russia banned the import of dairy products from Armenia starting July 27. The Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance of the Russian Federation (Rosselkhoznadzor) attributed this to alleged violations discovered during inspections of Armenian dairy processing plants.

Pashinyan: ‘Russia wants either exclusive ties or nothing’

JAM News
July 30 2026
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has once again addressed the current state of relations between Armenia and Russia. He commented in particular on Russia’s restrictions on imports of Armenian goods, an issue that has caused growing concern in Armenia. During a briefing, Pashinyan said the country should view the situation not as a crisis but as an opportunity to diversify its economy.

Journalists asked him to address the political dimension of the issue, arguing that it clearly extends beyond economics. Pashinyan said the problem stems from Armenia’s search for alternatives that it previously did not have.

As an example, he pointed to the signing of strategic partnership agreements with China, the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France and other countries.

According to Pashinyan, Armenia had never before had — and could not have had — strategic relations with so many partners.

“I cannot speak about Russia’s feelings. I can say that Russia sees this as a problem. There is also an element of exclusivity here. The issue is this: either the relationship is exclusive, or there should be no relationship at all. We do not share that view,” he said.

Pashinyan said Yerevan’s position is “legitimate.” Armenia’s ties with Russia are not exclusive, he said, but the relationship should continue.

“I ask that our position be treated with understanding and respect, especially since its legitimacy is not questioned in practice,” he said.

Pashinyan also stressed that Armenia would continue discussions with Russia over the economic restrictions that Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union have imposed on Armenian goods.

“That would be the worst possible course of action,” he added.


  • Russia destroyed 40,000 Armenian roses shipped via Belarus
  • EU chief visits Yerevan with pledge to ‘open doors’ for Armenian exports
  • Armenia unveils exporter support programme to offset Russian restrictions
  • ‘We know better when to decide’: Nikol Pashinyan responds to Vladimir Putin on choice between EU and EAEU

“What was wrong with Armenia? What did Armenia do?”

Journalists asked why Russia places such importance on Armenia’s political orientation and whether Pashinyan had given Moscow any reason to doubt that Armenia remains a reliable partner. In response, the prime minister posed a series of questions:

“What was wrong with Armenia in 2022 that the Collective Security Treaty Organization failed to fulfil its obligations? What did Armenia do wrong? Whom did Armenia harm? What did Armenia do that justified what happened?” he said, referring to Russia’s and the CSTO’s failure to respond after Azerbaijani forces entered Armenia’s internationally recognised territory in 2021–2022, despite the alliance’s obligation to act in the event of an attack on a member state’s territorial integrity.

What was wrong with Armenia that the Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh failed to fulfil their mission? Was the problem October 2022?” he continued, referring to the 6 October 2022 statement signed by Armenia and Azerbaijan in Prague, in which the two countries recognised each other’s territorial integrity. “But there were incidents even before that. What was wrong with Armenia? And why is it always assumed that we are the bad partner?”

“We are showing who needs Armenia”

Continuing on the issue, Pashinyan referred to Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko’s remark, “Who needs Armenia?”

“Has Armenia harmed anyone? Has it harmed Belarus? How can anyone speak about a sovereign state like that?” he said.

Pashinyan argued that the Belarusian president had asked the question but failed to find an answer. Now, he said, Armenia is showing exactly who values relations with it.

“Armenia matters to China, the United States, the European Union and Iran. And Armenia needs all of those partners as well. Georgia needs Armenia, and Armenia needs Georgia. Armenia matters to France, Germany, Poland and the United Kingdom. That’s the whole story.”

“The alternative is not yet in place” for a referendum

In recent months, Moscow has repeatedly urged Armenia to choose between the Eurasian Economic Union and the European Union. Russian officials have insisted that Armenia should hold a referendum on the issue as soon as possible. At the end of May, the leaders of four EAEU member states issued a joint statement calling for such a vote.

“I respect the fact that, on 29 May, the leaders of four EAEU countries issued a statement supporting the idea of a referendum on EU membership. But there is still nothing to vote on,” Pashinyan said.

He reiterated that it would make sense to hold a referendum only after Armenia obtains EU candidate status or once the issue formally appears on the agenda.

According to the prime minister, Moscow does not challenge Yerevan’s right to pursue alternatives. Instead, it is telling Armenia: “Decide today which alternative you choose.”

“But the alternative is not yet in place. The process of creating it has only just begun. It would be dishonest to ask people now whether they support an alternative that does not yet exist. They would ask many questions that we simply cannot answer today,” he said.

Pashinyan said the government would continue working to answer those questions before asking the public to make a choice.

The beginning of the end of the EAEU or the end of illusions: Armenia’s choice

Eurasia Daily
July 30, 2026
July 30th, 2026
21:44

Nikol Pashinyan’s telephone conversation with Vladimir Putin on July 27 did not solve the main problem, for which the Armenian prime minister actually turned to the Russian president. Restrictions on the supply of Armenian products to Russia’s sanctions remain in force, specific dates for their cancellation have not been named, and manufacturers continue to incur losses. Two days after the conversation, Pashinyan tried to present it as a political dialogue that had taken place, but his own statements confirmed that there was no practical result on the export issue yet.

On July 29, after a meeting of the Civil Contract board, Pashinyan said that the conversation with Putin “turned out” because the leaders talked for a long time and allegedly came to a common understanding on a number of issues. According to him, Russia recognizes Armenia’s “legitimate right” to form foreign policy and economic alternatives. Pashinyan also said that he told Putin: Armenia has announced a move to the side The EU will continue to follow this path, especially since voters supported the relevant program of the ruling party.

However, the duration of the conversation by itself does not mean that agreements have been reached. The official communications of the parties do not contain a decision to lift restrictions, nor an agreed mechanism for the return of Armenian goods to the Russian market, nor a specific time frame for resolving the crisis.

According to the Armenian government, Pashinyan told Putin that restrictions on the export of goods of Armenian origin contradict the Armenian-Russian legal framework and regulations of the EAEU, and then asked to take measures to solve the problem. The Kremlin, for its part, said that the conversation took place precisely on the initiative of the Armenian side. In other words, it was Pashinyan who called Putin with a request to intervene in the situation, and not the Russian president who called the Armenian prime minister with a proposal to lift restrictions.

Instead of promising to restore the previous trade regime, Putin again emphasized the need to hold a referendum on joining the EU or staying in the EAEU in Armenia as soon as possible. It is this difference in official accents that best shows the real outcome of the conversation: Yerevan was talking about goods and losses, Moscow was talking about Armenia’s geopolitical choice.

The story of Putin’s lack of congratulations on the results of the parliamentary elections is also indicative. To a direct question from journalists, Pashinyan replied: “If he didn’t want to, he didn’t congratulate,” and then added: “He didn’t congratulate, but then who was he talking to?” Thus, the prime minister tried to present the very fact of the telephone conversation as an indirect recognition of his status and election results. But such an argument looks strained. Moreover, according to the Kremlin’s official statement, the initiator of the call was not Putin, but the Armenian side. Moreover, Pashinyan said that the parties agreed to meet in the future, but there is also no specific date for the meeting yet.

More details: https://www.eadaily.com/en/news/2026/07/30/the-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-eaeu-or-the-end-of-illusions-armenias-choice-after-putins-conversation-with-pashinyan

Armenpress: Kazakhstan views hosting of Games of the Future 2026 as historic m

Sports12:07, 31 July 2026
Read the article in: Armenian:

Kazakhstan has described its hosting of the 2026 Games of the Future as a historic milestone, emphasizing the event’s role in preparing for future challenges in sports and technology.

Astana is currently hosting the third edition of the Games of the Future, bringing together traditional sports and modern digital technologies.

Speaking at a press briefing, Meiram Sapargali, an official representative of Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Tourism and Sports, emphasized the significance of holding this international tournament in Kazakhstan, noting that the country is using the event to elevate both traditional and phygital sports to a new level.

“In previous editions of the Games of the Future, national teams participated. This year, however, the format has changed. Clubs from different countries now take part, and their squads may include athletes from various nations. Another important change concerns the competition system. Each host country selects the disciplines itself. This year, eight disciplines have been chosen: football, basketball, several Counter-Strike formats, and, for the first time, sport dancing has been included in the program,” he said.

According to Sapargali, Kazakhstan’s main goal is to develop phygital sports in the country, and Kazakh athletes are already achieving strong results on the international stage. Next year, Kazakhstan is also expected to host the World Esports Championship.

“Previously, the Games of the Future were hosted by Russia and Abu Dhabi. Experience shows that the tournament format is gradually shifting toward club-based competitions. First, this makes the event more interesting, and second, esports athletes are already accustomed to competing as part of clubs rather than national teams. Since phygital sports are not equally developed in all countries, the club format is probably the most practical solution.

Kazakhstan is consistently working to develop technologies, including digital technologies. This is a historic moment, as Kazakhstan is hosting the Games of the Future for the first time. If previously they were held in countries with highly developed infrastructure, Kazakhstan has now become the first country in Central Asia to host this prestigious competition,” he emphasized.

More than 800 athletes and esports representatives from over 30 countries will compete in Astana.

Read the article in: Armenian:

Published by Armenpress, original at