Newspaper: Even PACE could not “turn a blind eye” to Armenia parliament electi

News.am, Armenia
Sept 28, 2026

Past daily of Armenia writes as follows, in particular: The fourth part of the annual session of PACE is underway in Strasbourg, in the work of which the [Armenian] opposition also participates (…).

Yesterday was an important day, since an issue directly related to Armenia was being discussed, namely the NA [i.e. National Assembly] anti-democratic elections held in June, accompanied by repressions and targeted arrests of competitors, which stood out with a simply outrageous “painting” during the vote counting.

What is noteworthy? The fact that the observation delegation of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) is even raising its voice about the electoral scandals. That is, the violations were so terrible and monstrous that even the European organizations that keep the power of [Armenian PM Nikol] Pashinyan with “hand and foot” cannot keep quiet about it. Moreover, in some episodes they simply “water down” the propaganda of the Pashinyan authorities regarding the elections.

As we can see, the PACE observers and the head of the observation group are quite well aware of the realities, although they sometimes prefer to express themselves vaguely about them for political reasons. Moreover, despite the violations recorded by them, they also note that the parliamentary elections in Armenia were, in general, organized, democratic, etc. (…).

Now let us record that despite the politicized bias, even the PACE observation mission was forced to record—at the level of a report—the problematic actions of the [Armenian] authorities they cherish.

—

Russia Tightens Cash Outflow Limits to Neighboring Countries

The Moscow Times
Sept 29, 2026

President Vladimir Putin signed an executive order on Tuesday tightening restrictions on taking cash from Russia to neighboring countries.

Individuals are now prohibited from taking more than 1 million rubles ($11,900) in cash to Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.

Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan are members of the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union.

Individuals had previously been allowed to move the ruble equivalent of $100,000 under an order signed by Putin in March.

In addition, businesses are banned from removing any amount of cash from the country, according to the newspaper Kommersant.

Individual violators of the new restrictions face total confiscation of any sums exceeding 1 million rubles, while businesses caught attempting to transfer funds will be forced to surrender the entire cash amount.

Exceptions apply to travelers passing through government-designated international airports, official diplomatic missions and individuals who provide bank authorization statements.

The new restrictions take effect immediately.

Russia previously banned individuals from taking more than $10,000 in foreign currency out of the country in March 2022 following the launch of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.


—

UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances publishes findings on Armenia, Belize,

Sept 29, 2026

29 September 2026

GENEVA – The UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances (CED) today issued its findings on Armenia, Belize, Gabon and Lesotho after reviewing the four States Parties during its latest session.

The findings present the Committee’s main concerns and recommendations regarding the implementation of the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, as well as positive aspects. Key issues include:

Armenia

The Committee was concerned about the limited information concerning the search for persons whose disappearance occurred outside of military operations and not falling within the scope of the Law on Persons Missing under Conditions and Circumstances Resulting from Military Operations, and about the slow progress of the search for all disappeared persons. It also raised concerns about the lack of progress of investigations into allegations of enforced disappearance, including in the context of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and noted that relatives were not regularly informed of the progress and results of searches and investigations. The Committee recommended that Armenia develop comprehensive search strategies, ensuring that all persons who have disappeared are searched for until their fate and whereabouts are clarified, regardless of the time, place, and circumstances in which the disappearances occurred. It also called for all allegations to be effectively investigated in a coordinated way; perpetrators to be prosecuted and appropriately punished; and for victims to be informed, able to participate in proceedings and receive full reparation.

The Committee welcomed the commitment to include a specific reference in the peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan to the need to address cases of disappeared persons and enforced disappearances, but was concerned that cooperation between the two countries remains limited and that the modalities of cooperation on disappeared persons will be determined in a separate arrangement upon ratification of the peace agreement. It urged Armenia to strengthen cooperation and mutual legal assistance with Azerbaijan and other neighbouring countries; called for closer cooperation among the commissions dealing with cases of disappeared persons, prosecutors and law enforcement authorities; and for the rapid establishment of a mechanism to facilitate the search for, recovery, and identification of located bodies and human remains.

continue reading on the other countries at the link below:

—

Armenia Investigative Committee declines to provide list of names of missing p

News.am, Armenia
Sept 29, 2026

In response to a written request from Armenian News-NEWS.am, the Investigative Committee of Armenia reported that 3,833 people had died from the Armenian side as a result of the 44-day war of 2020, of whom 3,755 were servicepersons and 78 were civilians.

Also, the whereabouts of 191 people are unknown, of whom 172 are servicepersons and 19 are civilians.

The Investigative Committee, however, declined to provide a list of the names of the missing persons and casualties, their dates of birth, as well as the number of bodies undergoing DNA analysis and the number of identified bodies, noting that in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code and the Law on Freedom of Information of Armenia, the provision of other information related to the content of the questions is denied.

—

What will happen to the Nairit plant in Armenia: Rosatom joined the liquidatio

Sept 29, 2026

What will happen to the Nairit plant in Armenia: Rosatom joined the liquidation of the enterprise

The territory of the former chemical complex is planned to be cleared of hazardous substances and prepared for further use

29 September 2026, 11:24NewsYuliya Shelkovenko0

Rosatom is working with Armenian partners on the Nairit project, related to the liquidation of the legacy of the synthetic rubber plant in Yerevan. This was announced by the CEO of the state corporation Alexey Likhachev to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

According to Likhachev, Rosatom controls the handling of industrial waste of the 1st (lamps, thermometers, chemical reagents) and 2nd hazard classes (batteries with electrolyte, pesticides). Enterprises within the state corporation’s perimeter are engaged in dismantling decommissioned enterprises and liquidating hazardous waste. This includes the Baikal Pulp and Paper Mill (frozen in 2013), as well as the Krasny Bor landfill, he added.

But also, the trends of the last year and a half are entering foreign sites in Kyrgyzstan, in Belarus, we are working with Armenian partners on the Nairit project. I hope, perhaps, we will also be able to provide assistance.
Alexey Likhachev, CEO of Rosatom

Nairit began producing chloroprene rubber in 1940. In the 1980s, the enterprise produced about 75–80 thousand tons of chloroprene rubber per year and manufactured other chemical products, including liquid chlorine, caustic soda, and hydrochloric acid.

Nairit was finally shut down in 2010. In 2025, the Armenian government approved the preparation of an environmental rehabilitation and restoration program for the enterprise’s territory with the support of the World Bank. As part of the preparatory phase, Armenia received a grant of 1.5 million dollars for program development, technical assessments, and measures to neutralize equipment and chemical waste.

Rosatom also continues work at the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant as part of extending its operational life until 2036. Likhachev added that the Armenian leadership must make a further decision on the future of the plant.

Earlier, Rosatom Service and the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant signed an agreement to extend the plant’s operational life until 2036. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan also allowed for a further extension until 2046.


—

Christian Solidarity International rejects Armenia government report on Armeni

News.am, Armenia
Sept 29, 2026

The Christian Solidarity International (CSI) completely rejects the Armenian government report on the crisis surrounding the Armenian Apostolic Church and the ways to resolve it. The CSI noted this in a statement, which reads as follows:

“The Government of Armenia has issued a report ‘on the crisis that has emerged in the church as a result of the actions of the de facto head of the Armenian Apostolic Holy Church and a number of senior clergy, and on ways to resolve it.’

Christian Solidarity International (CSI) has examined this report and rejects it in its entirety. Its authorship, its methodology and the motives behind it seriously undermine its findings. The report is also an affront to the well-established principle of Church autonomy, guaranteed by both Armenian and international law.

Contrary to what the report states, the Church crisis is one of the Government’s own making. The report has been published as part of a sustained, state-sponsored campaign against the Armenian Apostolic Holy Church (AAHC), a Church that has endured for more than 1,700 years and has long stood in defence of the Armenian nation.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan seeks to overthrow His Holiness Karekin II, Catholicos of All Armenians, and to bring the Church under state control, a goal he has pursued for more than a year. His plan to remove the Catholicos featured in his party’s election manifesto and is now written into his Government’s programme. The report also follows the politically motivated arrests of senior clerics, spurious criminal charges against the Catholicos and six bishops, and government-backed efforts to foster splits in the Church. These and other measures violate the autonomy of the AAHC and call into question the Armenian government’s commitment to democracy and the rule of law.

The report is not the product of an independent inquiry or of any impartial or judicial process. It was written on the express instruction of the Prime Minister by his own press office. A government press office has no competence in theology or canon law, yet its authors quote the canons selectively and presume to pronounce on ecclesiastical matters. Some of the allegations are so grave that they should be examined by a proper tribunal, not aired in a political document issued by the Government as part of a discriminatory campaign. Indeed, by publishing such allegations while clerics, including the Catholicos, are facing trial, the Government also gravely prejudices their right to a fair hearing and to the presumption of innocence.

The report states that it relies on ‘open sources.’ In practice, that means news sites, YouTube clips and Facebook posts, including the Prime Minister’s own. It offers almost no primary evidence, and many of the claims are unsubstantiated gossip, innuendo or hearsay. Many are made by clergy who have been disciplined by the Church, and several are long-standing opponents of the Catholicos. Where the Catholicos has not answered an accusation, his silence is treated as proof. What the report calls its “evidentiary basis” is weak. It has been assembled to justify a verdict reached long before the report was written, and it would not withstand scrutiny before any court or tribunal.

The report accuses the Catholicos of engaging in politics. It fails to acknowledge that he has acted in accordance with the Church’s exclusive mission, recognised in Armenia’s Constitution, in the spiritual life of the Armenian people and the preservation of their national identity. Nor does it say anything of the context in which the Church has spoken: the Government’s failures in the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War of 2020 and the ethnic cleansing of Nagorno Karabakh in 2023, the third anniversary of which falls this month. Speaking in defence of a grieving and displaced nation is not unlawful political activity. It conforms to the very role the Constitution anticipates for the Church.

Armenian law is equally clear that, although the AAHC is the national church, it is autonomous and self-governing. The State has no role in removing or replacing the Catholicos, a process that is governed wholly by the Church’s own canon law. Nor should the Government be peddling such reports to support its discriminatory campaign.

CSI calls on the Government of Armenia to withdraw the report, abandon its plan to remove the Catholicos and respect the autonomy of the AAHC. CSI also urges Armenia’s international partners—including the United States, the European Union and the Council of Europe—to remind Prime Minister Pashinyan of Armenia’s human rights obligations and to press his Government to cease interfering in the internal affairs of the Church.

John Eibner

President

Christian Solidarity International”

—

Russia has presented Armenia with a proposal to build a new 1 GW nuclear power

ARKA, Armenia
Sept 29, 2026
29.09.2026, 15:39

Russia has submitted a concrete proposal to Armenia for the construction of a new 1 GW nuclear power unit.
 
YEREVAN, September 29. /ARKA/. Russia has submitted a concrete proposal to Armenia for the construction of a new 1 GW nuclear power unit. Alexey Likhachev, CEO of Rosatom, stated this in response to a question from the ARKA news agency during a briefing following talks with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

Likhachev described the discussions with Pashinyan regarding the future of nuclear energy in Armenia as “deep in terms of expertise and broad in scope.”

“Today, we heard with great satisfaction that Armenia’s nuclear expertise—its nuclear energy capabilities—will be developed. I think this is a very important stage in our negotiations,” Likhachev said.

Regarding which vendor (partner) Armenia might choose for the new nuclear power plant construction and which technological scheme it might prefer, Likhachev suggested not speculating too far ahead.

He emphasized that Rosatom has experience working with various financial scenarios and would be able to offer Armenia a truly viable option—not only from a technological standpoint but also in terms of economics for Armenian consumers.

“I cannot speculate right now on the technological or economic scenarios… That is a matter for the Armenian government to decide. However, it is clear that new intergovernmental agreements will be required,” Likhachev noted. According to the government press service, during a meeting with Likhachev, Pashinyan stated that the Armenian government is continuing to discuss proposals received from international partners regarding the construction of a new nuclear power unit, and a decision will be made in the near future. He noted that the final decision would be based exclusively on economic factors, taking into account price, quality, safety, timelines, and guarantees.

—

Rosatom sees no technical obstacles to extending the Armenian NPP’s operation

ARKA, Armenia
Sept 29, 2026
29.09.2026, 15:43

Rosatom sees no technical obstacles to extending the service life of the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) until 2036, while the possibility of further extending the plant’s operation to 2046 is also being explored in Armenia.
YEREVAN, September 29. /ARKA/. Rosatom sees no technical obstacles to extending the service life of the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) until 2036, while the possibility of further extending the plant’s operation to 2046 is also being explored in Armenia. Rosatom Director General Alexey Likhachev stated this in response to a question from the ARKA news agency during a briefing following talks with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

“We have smoothly transitioned into the second phase of the extension to 2036—a phase that can be somewhat conditionally divided into two stages: up to 2031, and from 2031 to 2036. Most of the work related to the 2031 milestone has been completed; just yesterday, within the framework of the working group, we confirmed 100% completion of the production targets,” Likhachev said.

According to him, future work will proceed with the 2036 target in mind.

“Neither I nor our specialists have any doubt that the plant’s operation will be extended to 2036,” the Rosatom chief noted.
At the same time, Likhachev emphasized that the final decision rests with the operating organization—the plant itself—and the regulator, the Nuclear Safety Regulatory Committee of Armenia.

Likhachev also reported that Armenia’s leadership and specialists are examining the possibility of extending the NPP’s operation even further—from 2036 to 2046.

“Theoretically, such a possibility exists, and we are ready to organize this work if such a decision is made.” “But beyond technical feasibility, we must also consider economic viability,” he said.

According to Likhachev’s estimates, extending the plant’s operation until 2046 would require investments amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars. These funds would be allocated for upgrading safety and automation systems, re-annealing the reactor vessel, and expanding and repairing spent nuclear fuel storage facilities.

He noted that the necessary capital expenditures could, in turn, lead to higher electricity costs during the 2036–2046 period.

“Electricity costs could even double if the full scope of work for the extension to 2046 is carried out,” Likhachev stated.

As an alternative, he proposed limiting the current power unit’s service life to 2036 while making a decision to build a new unit as soon as possible.

—

London: HMRC worker accused of trying to use her position to ‘kill Russians fo

The Independent, UK
Sept 29, 2026

The original appeal was not upheld, so the woman took HMRC to an employment tribunal in Edinburgh

An Armenian HMRC trainee who was accused of trying to use her position to ‘kill Russians for killing her family’ has won over £16,000 in compensation.

An employment tribunal heard that the trainee, known only as Ms X, never made comments about ‘getting back at Russians’.

Instead her ‘patronising’ manager invented the comments by making false notes during a private meeting between them.

After disciplining her for the false accusation, an inexperienced appeal officer worsened the allegation by misunderstanding that the trainee had claimed she wanted to ‘kill Russians’ as she was ‘medically paranoid’.

The government organisation has now been ordered to pay the woman £16,506.95 in compensation.

Ms X is an Armenian woman who is from the semi-autonomous state of Abkhazia in Georgia.

She speaks fluent English but her first language is Russian and she speaks with a Russian accent.

She was granted asylum in the UK in 2004 and was naturalised as a citizen shortly after.

Ms X initially began working for HMRC in January 2019 and completed her probation before leaving in January 2020.

She returned as a trainee in July 2022, where Damian Robson was her line manager.

Mr Robson described himself as ‘an empathetic and relaxed manager’, but the tribunal noted his emails to Ms X ‘did not display that’ and were in fact ‘patronising’, ‘hostile’ and ‘inappropriate’.

Ms X had changed her surname in 2019 while previously working for HMRC, as she had a very distinctive surname that ‘identified her as an Armenian from Abkhazia’.

Due to the complicated culture of Ms X’s home country, it is not uncommon for people ‘to intimidate the woman into compliance, where a woman does not behave as expected’, such as when she is unmarried or leaves home.

Ms X had previously suffered ‘a violent attack’ for these reasons and, following advice from police and a lawyer, she subsequently changed her surname in 2019.

But she saw when she re-joined HMRC that her old surname was visible for all 65,000 HMRC employees on its computer system.

Ms X sent an email to Mr Robson to bring this to his attention – but he approached her in the open plan office to ‘question her extensively’ in ‘a disturbing and an unnecessary manner’ as to why she was in danger.

The trainee was apprehensive because of the publicity of the situation in the open plan office but still attempted to explain fully her concerns.

However Mr Robson dismissed them, ‘explained that he had 29 years’ experience in law enforcement, and he could not understand’ and then ‘took no action’ to help her.

Ms X ‘remained very concerned’ but approached HR herself and her old name was removed a month later.

On August 18, the trainees were all added to an online call as it was announced which department they would go to for the next two years.

It was said that these were ‘randomly selected’, leading Ms X to question how the random selection was controlled.

She and another trainee were unhappy with their assignments so asked if they were able to swap, but Mr Robson said the request was ‘perplexing’ and denied the request in a patronising manner.

Ms X and Mr Robson were both part of a scheduled video call the next day, on August 19, and after the call the manager asked her to stay so they could discuss allocation.

During the meeting, Ms X expressed a preference to work in Customs & International Trade.

She said ‘her background in research and analysis would be better suited to that area’, and also that her experience of Russian language and culture might be useful there.

They spoke for almost an hour and Mr Robson took notes without Ms X’s knowledge, which he later compiled into 91 paragraphs of meeting minutes.

Within the six-page document, it described how Ms X had insisted she be put into Customs & International Trade because she ‘could get back at Russia for killing my family’.

Mr Robson sent the notes to the trainee 10 days after their meeting while she was on holiday and she replied that they were ‘not an accurate reflection’ of what was said.

However he used the made-up quote to bring disciplinary action against Ms X, and on September 1, 2022 an investigation was started into her conduct.

A manager was appointing to investigate, though he had never done so before.

Despite having no medical training, the manager used Ms X’s concerns for her own safety as reason to claim she was ‘medically paranoid’.

He then ignored Ms X’s evidence and said that Mr Robson would have no motive to make anything up about her.

He ‘drew a negative inference’ about Ms X because she called Mr Robson a ‘liar’, and even tried to upgrade the investigation against her to say she had committed gross misconduct, which was denied.

He found the accusation regarding ‘getting back at Russians’ proven just because Russian had been mentioned during the meeting.

Ms X was issued a first written warning.

She appealed the decision but a second manager who had no experience in the role was appointed the appeal manager.

This manager ‘conducted an extremely cursory review’, and even substantiated a completely incorrect allegation that Ms X ‘had stated that she would use her position to kill Russians’.

The appeal was not upheld, so Ms X took HMRC to an employment tribunal in Edinburgh.

There, Employment Judge Melanie Sangster concluded that she was the victim of direct and indirect race discrimination.

EJ Sangster said: “If [Ms X] had stated, as [Mr Robson] indicated, that she wished to use her position within [HMRC] to ‘get back at the Russians for killing her family’, the Tribunal concluded that the response from [Mr Robson] would not have been that he would simply ‘leave that comment to one side’ and move on.

“He would, at very least, have expressed shock at the statement and told [Ms X] that what she had stated was entirely inappropriate.”

It was found that Mr Robson had falsely accused Ms X of misconduct because of her race.

The judge continued: “The Tribunal concluded that the other comments, which [Mr Robson] stated [Ms X] said to him in his one-to-one meeting with her on August 19 2022, were not in fact said.

“The Tribunal accordingly concluded that the alleged treatment occurred: [Mr Robson] did falsely accuse [Ms X] of misconduct.

“The Tribunal accordingly finds that, in falsely accusing [Ms X] of misconduct, [HMRC] treated [her] less favourably because of race.”

HMRC has now been ordered to pay Ms X, who continues to work there, £16,506.95 for injury to feelings.

Further claims of harassment related to race were dismissed.


—

Trump got the Caucasus peace deal. Now Europe is stuck in the past

Sept 29, 2026
By Taras Kuzio

When Europe’s leaders gathered in Yerevan, Armenia, in May, the sharpest words about Europe’s view of the South Caucasus came from a leader who was not in the room.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, speaking by video link from Baku, used his allotted time at the European Political Community summit to rebuke the European Parliament for a resolution it had passed days earlier and accuse it of sabotaging his country’s peace process with Armenia.

Just years ago, an Azerbaijani leader addressing a summit in the Armenian capital would have seemed unreal.

That he spent the time scolding the Europeans and not the Armenians says even more about how relations between the two former foes have changed, and how little European thinking has changed with them. That disconnect is costly in a region whose stability is central to European interests: The South Caucasus forms the only major overland route between Europe and Asia that bypasses both Russia and Iran, while offering Europe an energy corridor for Caspian and Central Asian gas.

Six years ago this week, a 44-day conflict began that returned Karabakh to Azerbaijan — internationally recognized Azerbaijani territory that had been held by Armenian forces since the wars of Soviet dissolution. At the time, Baku’s restoration of sovereignty over the region and the departure of its Armenian population were widely expected to entrench Armenian-Azerbaijani enmity for another generation.

Instead, it created the conditions for rapprochement. The two sworn enemies are now closer to a durable peace than at any point since the bloody six-year war of the late 1980s and early 1990s that drove Azerbaijanis from Karabakh and surrounding territories.

Europe, as it tends to with wars on its eastern edges, fell back on its usual tropes. Western debate following the 44-day war revolved around the rights and security of Karabakh’s Armenians and some type of special political status for the region. Those talking points never took into account what happened on the ground — the restoration of an internationally recognized country’s territorial integrity. They remained tethered to the same prewar mediation framework that had failed for decades, leaving Europe reliant on assumptions overtaken by events and weakening its credibility as an intermediary.

For Baku, the contradiction was clear: The same European capitals that insisted on Ukraine retaining its borders defined in 1991 against Russia’s all-out invasion saw Azerbaijan’s claims as open to negotiations. That credibility deficit eventually caught up with European mediation: In October 2023, talks unraveled at the European Union-led summit in Granada, Spain, amid Azerbaijani accusations that France was siding with Armenia.

Meanwhile, Azerbaijan and Armenia pressed ahead through bilateral talks, agreeing on the text of a peace treaty by March 2025. Five months later, President Donald Trump and his administration brought the two leaders to the White House to initial the deal.

Territorial claims are now over. No soldier has been killed on the border in nearly three years. Azerbaijani fuel has been flowing to Armenia by rail via Georgia since December 2025, and Armenia is now preparing to send goods the other way.

Baku and Yerevan are looking to restore and reopen shared transit routes, including the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity, and both countries have hinted at reestablishing passenger train lines, shut down and dismantled nearly four decades ago.

Slowly, yet by no means universally, Europeans have begun to accept that territorial integrity lies at the heart of any settlement. Europe now needs to catch up with a reality it has only belatedly begun to recognize.

Ironically, the bloc now finds itself in a position of leverage. Armenia is turning toward the EU as it loosens its dependence on Russia, and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, reelected in June, has made European integration the centerpiece of his foreign policy.

For once, Brussels could play a decisive role in taking the peace process from an initialed agreement to a signed treaty. The last obstacle lies in Yerevan, where what Europe says carries significant weight.

Armenia’s constitution invokes the 1990 Declaration of Independence, which, in turn, cites the 1989 decision to unify Soviet Armenia with Karabakh. Baku regards that as an outstanding claim to Azerbaijani territory, and therefore a red line before any peace treaty can be signed and brought into force.

Removing the reference to Karabakh requires a new constitution adopted by referendum, which Pashinyan promised to hold once the election was behind him. His party fell short of the two-thirds majority that would have let it carry the process alone, so he will need votes from elsewhere.

SPAIN IS BECOMING NATO’S NEXT DICTATORSHIP. TRUMP MUST ACT NOW

Europe should not let that calculation become an excuse for waiting, and the EU should tie progress on Armenia’s European ambitions to Yerevan finally resolving its long-standing feud.

For decades, Europe’s capitals treated the region based on suppositions that are now long obsolete. Now, Armenia has reelected the leader who promised to remove the last barrier to the peace process. After years of finding itself behind events in the South Caucasus, Europe now has an opportunity to help bring that process to a close.

Taras Kuzio is a professor of political science at the National University of Kyiv Mohyla Academy and the author of Russian Nationalism and the Russian-Ukrainian War and Crimea 2014-2024: Where Russia’s War Started and Where Ukraine Will Win. He is also a co-editor of Russia and Modern Fascism: New Perspectives on the Kremlin’s War Against Ukraine and a co-author of The Four Roots of Russia’s War Against Ukraine.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4745602/armenia-azerbaijan-peace-treaty-europe-leverage/ 

—